Just days before the expected launch of two new much-anticipated iPhones on
Tuesday, more images have emerged of what's purported to be Apple's
next-generation iPad.
Sonny Dickson, who is a frequent leaker of all things Apple, on Sunday
posted an extensive gallery of alleged 5th-generation iPad parts, including an
assembled shell that appears identical to previous image leaks. If legitimate,
the photos appear to buttress previous image leaks and rumors that the iPad 5
will take many of its design cues from the iPad Mini, with a thinner profile and
more rounded edges and corners.
Previous purported leaks from Dickson included images of what appeared to
be the front panelof the iPad 5.
While Apple has planned a media event for Tuesday at which many expect new
iPhones to be unveiled, company observers don't expect a new iPad 5 or iPad Mini
to be announced at the event. "It contradicts everything we've heard thus far
about Apple's fall iOS Device launch plans from our sources," 9to5Mac
concluded.
2013年9月8日星期日
In actual fact even finding the Desktop
Now, that doesn't imply XP will suddenly quit working. You may preserve
working with it if you would like, but I would not suggest it.
End of life suggests Microsoft will not be releasing any a lot more security updates to the typical user. Any security flaws that hackers discover will not be fixed. Your computer is going to be a sitting duck, even with safety software installed. Click here to see what no cost safety software I advise.
I know quite a few die-hard XP users are cynical about this news. They believe Microsoft is trying to force men and women acquire new computer systems. Microsoft is in business to create cash, so it does want men and women to upgrade. But in Microsoft's defense, this isn't a thing special for XP.
Microsoft has completed the same with Windows 95, 98 and Me. Vista's end of life is April 11, 2017 and Windows 7's is January 14, 2020. In reality, Microsoft extended XP's end-of-life date quite a few times. XP should happen to be gone years ago.
Here's a exciting reality: XP first appeared at the finish of 2001. As late as 2010, computer systems have been still sold with XP installed. Windows Vista, which arrived 6 years following XP, only lasted till 2011.
Should you contemplate it, XP are going to be nearly 13 years old. Like a teenager, it's getting problems adjusting to the planet. In spite of a major overhaul with Service Pack three, XP just wasn't built for the contemporary digital age.
It really is missing essential security capabilities introduced in Windows Vista. It can't assistance the latest, safest and most Web-compatible versions of Web Explorer. It can't take full benefit with the most recent hardware advances.
It really is becoming increasingly frustrating for shoppers and third-party companies. Several third-party providers would really like to cease supporting XP. It takes many money and time to produce confident applications and hardware function on each version of Windows.
This even impacts the online world. Internet developers will likely be overjoyed to find out XP-only World-wide-web Explorer versions 6, 7 and eight go away. These versions are so far behind other browsers, you virtually need to write another website just for them.
It's going to become a significant change for many folks. In most situations it really is going to imply a new computer, upgraded software and possibly new accessories like printers and scanners.
Until final year, upgrading would not happen to be pretty so bad. Windows 7 was nevertheless relatively close to Windows XP in look and how it worked. In reality, I count on Windows 7 to be the next Windows version that individuals stick with for very a although.
Now, even so, Windows 8 is definitely the only operating system out there on new computer systems. If you try it, you are going to discover that it is radically distinct from prior Windows versions.
The interface was meant for touch-screen tablets and doesn't work that effectively with keyboard and mouse. In actual fact, even finding the Desktop is an adventure in itself.
The Windows 8.1 update coming out subsequent month will enable you to bring back several of the old Windows. Microsoft will even contain a tutorial on tips on how to use Windows eight - ultimately. But it is nonetheless a steep learning curve, specifically windows 7 ultimate activation key coming from XP. Click here to learn a lot more about producing essentially the most of the Windows eight.1 update.
You'll be able to uncover copies of Windows 7 for sale on the internet. You'll be able to set up it on your existing computer - assuming it isn't also old. You may also get a Windows eight pc and downgrade.
Just be aware which you can not do an in-place upgrade from XP to 7. You will have to wipe your challenging drive and install Windows 7 from scratch. For those who get an upgrade version of Windows 7, you'll need Windows XP installation discs to prove that you just are eligible. Whatever you do, commence planning now. April will be coming up quick and also you don't want to be still working with XP when it arrives.
Now, you may hear there's a slim opportunity Microsoft could continue releasing safety updates for XP. It's under contract to some organizations to provide them for the subsequent few years. Nonetheless, that's a paid choice and I wouldn't hold your breath that Microsoft will make these updates public.
End of life suggests Microsoft will not be releasing any a lot more security updates to the typical user. Any security flaws that hackers discover will not be fixed. Your computer is going to be a sitting duck, even with safety software installed. Click here to see what no cost safety software I advise.
I know quite a few die-hard XP users are cynical about this news. They believe Microsoft is trying to force men and women acquire new computer systems. Microsoft is in business to create cash, so it does want men and women to upgrade. But in Microsoft's defense, this isn't a thing special for XP.
Microsoft has completed the same with Windows 95, 98 and Me. Vista's end of life is April 11, 2017 and Windows 7's is January 14, 2020. In reality, Microsoft extended XP's end-of-life date quite a few times. XP should happen to be gone years ago.
Here's a exciting reality: XP first appeared at the finish of 2001. As late as 2010, computer systems have been still sold with XP installed. Windows Vista, which arrived 6 years following XP, only lasted till 2011.
Should you contemplate it, XP are going to be nearly 13 years old. Like a teenager, it's getting problems adjusting to the planet. In spite of a major overhaul with Service Pack three, XP just wasn't built for the contemporary digital age.
It really is missing essential security capabilities introduced in Windows Vista. It can't assistance the latest, safest and most Web-compatible versions of Web Explorer. It can't take full benefit with the most recent hardware advances.
It really is becoming increasingly frustrating for shoppers and third-party companies. Several third-party providers would really like to cease supporting XP. It takes many money and time to produce confident applications and hardware function on each version of Windows.
This even impacts the online world. Internet developers will likely be overjoyed to find out XP-only World-wide-web Explorer versions 6, 7 and eight go away. These versions are so far behind other browsers, you virtually need to write another website just for them.
It's going to become a significant change for many folks. In most situations it really is going to imply a new computer, upgraded software and possibly new accessories like printers and scanners.
Until final year, upgrading would not happen to be pretty so bad. Windows 7 was nevertheless relatively close to Windows XP in look and how it worked. In reality, I count on Windows 7 to be the next Windows version that individuals stick with for very a although.
Now, even so, Windows 8 is definitely the only operating system out there on new computer systems. If you try it, you are going to discover that it is radically distinct from prior Windows versions.
The interface was meant for touch-screen tablets and doesn't work that effectively with keyboard and mouse. In actual fact, even finding the Desktop is an adventure in itself.
The Windows 8.1 update coming out subsequent month will enable you to bring back several of the old Windows. Microsoft will even contain a tutorial on tips on how to use Windows eight - ultimately. But it is nonetheless a steep learning curve, specifically windows 7 ultimate activation key coming from XP. Click here to learn a lot more about producing essentially the most of the Windows eight.1 update.
You'll be able to uncover copies of Windows 7 for sale on the internet. You'll be able to set up it on your existing computer - assuming it isn't also old. You may also get a Windows eight pc and downgrade.
Just be aware which you can not do an in-place upgrade from XP to 7. You will have to wipe your challenging drive and install Windows 7 from scratch. For those who get an upgrade version of Windows 7, you'll need Windows XP installation discs to prove that you just are eligible. Whatever you do, commence planning now. April will be coming up quick and also you don't want to be still working with XP when it arrives.
Now, you may hear there's a slim opportunity Microsoft could continue releasing safety updates for XP. It's under contract to some organizations to provide them for the subsequent few years. Nonetheless, that's a paid choice and I wouldn't hold your breath that Microsoft will make these updates public.
2013年8月12日星期一
Obama’s Apple patent pardon reflects global IP hypocrisy
It may have seemed pragmatically necessary for US President Barack Obama to
override the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC’s) decision to ban certain
iPhone imports, after South Korean giant Samsung’s patent-infringement victory
against Apple looked to threaten the iOS dripfeed. And yet, in overriding the
rule of justice Obama has exposed a root hypocrisy that weakens America’s moral
authority to assert intellectual property control outside of its borders.
This it does, with fierce regularity. The spread of American culture – and the IP related to it – is hardly a new story. And, given the facility with which protected content can now be disseminated across the Internet, American IP-protection interests have been working overtime to assert their rights.
Australia, for one, has seen the results of this first-hand, both in action – for example, the ultimately unsuccessful action by American entertainment interests against major ISP iiNet on allegations it was facilitating mass piracy – and in word, such as the requirements in the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement that Australia harmonise its IP protection laws to those of the US. This is the reason Australian copyright now endures for 70 years after the death of a work’s creator, as opposed to 50 years before the FTA.
Similar issues have persisted in negotiations around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), in which Australian authorities have had to consider the legal status of geoblocking by largely American content interests such as Hulu and Netflix. Advocacy ofgeoblocking circumvention emerged, more recently, as a way to resolve controls that are seen by American companies as important IP protection – but increasingly seen by the Australian government as a way of enforcing anti-competitive access and pricing restrictions.
Those issues deal with disharmony between two countries’ laws – which is one thing. In Obama’s case, however, the decision to override an ITC ruling, for the first time since 1987, curiously has one country explicitly overriding its own IP controls. The result has been a very public double-standard that has the “concerned” South Korean government considering legal action and hometown hero Samsung reinforcing its martyr status as a warrior against American IP imperialism.
Intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.It may be hard to notice from inside US borders, but from the rest of the world it’s clear that intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.
This has very real implications in a country like Australia, where exclusive-licensing deals with US media interests are regularly being used to stifle competition.
Consider Pay-TV operator Foxtel – whose cable services around 20% of Australian homes – which years ago strongarmed one-time rival Optus Vision into irrelevance by securing exclusive rights to a range of popular content. More recently, Foxtel fought off challenges by Apple’s iTunes and Netflix-like on-demand operator Quickflix, which offered Game of Thrones season 3 on an on-demand basis but will be banned from doing so for season 4 because Foxtel has bought all rights to the show.
It’s not as bad as it was decades ago – when popular soaps like Days of our Lives were broadcast in Australia many years after showing in the US – but IP restrictions are still nonetheless distorting the distribution of content outside the US. Many movies still screen in Australia months after they're on DVD in the US; many popular US TV shows air ages later in Australia if at all; and unexplained consistently higher prices for even digital media and games all carry the stink of heavy-handed American copyright imperialism.
No wonder Australia has some of the world’s highest incidence of illegal downloading: restrictively expensive, exclusive legitimate services struggle for traction based on the demands of their American rights holders. Experience shows that, when more-flexible options are available, many people stop illegal downloads – but if IP protection is used more like a stick than a carrot, nothing will change.
Apple faces other IP-related issues in the e-books market, where mooted restrictions on its pricing are being considered as a consequence of a determination around Apple’s price setting. Publishers aren’t impressed at all – but aren’t such restrictions supposed to be the price of IP abuse?
Back to the iPhone. Apple’s victory last year over Samsung was significant both for its size and its import, but Samsung’s own victory – as represented by the US ITC’s decision to support a ban – was even more significant because it showed that the US government held itself to the same standards of behaviour as it expects other countries to do.
The government threw a spanner in the works by deciding to stifle the decision of an independent judiciary. This says an American company does not have to be bound by the same intellectual-property framework that the country is imposing on the rest of the world.Apple, emboldened by its newfound protector, is making new strides and has been allowed torevive patent claims against Google’s Motorola Mobility unit. Even more problematic, a subsequentITC ruling found that Samsung infringed upon two Apple patents – and that its products could therefore be banned in the US.
Will Obama once again intervene against such a ban, as some argue it should? This would certainly support its claims that it wants to establish and reinforce a precedent that ITC decisions are more determinations of principle than determinations of an real legal consequence.
The other option is that the administration allow an ITC ban against Samsung’s products to stand, citing the importance of the integrity of IP protection measures. This would be legally allowable but morally reprehensible.
These decisions only have limited impact on most people since they relate to older Apple and Samsung products that aren’t even generally sold anymore. But the potential for important legal precedent is nonetheless significant – and unless the Obama administration is seen to be treating all players equally, its position will reek of domestic favouritism. Content-licensing issues in Australia have long shown how well this sort of hypocrisy goes down outside the US; only time will tell how it goes down inside it.
This it does, with fierce regularity. The spread of American culture – and the IP related to it – is hardly a new story. And, given the facility with which protected content can now be disseminated across the Internet, American IP-protection interests have been working overtime to assert their rights.
Australia, for one, has seen the results of this first-hand, both in action – for example, the ultimately unsuccessful action by American entertainment interests against major ISP iiNet on allegations it was facilitating mass piracy – and in word, such as the requirements in the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement that Australia harmonise its IP protection laws to those of the US. This is the reason Australian copyright now endures for 70 years after the death of a work’s creator, as opposed to 50 years before the FTA.
Similar issues have persisted in negotiations around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), in which Australian authorities have had to consider the legal status of geoblocking by largely American content interests such as Hulu and Netflix. Advocacy ofgeoblocking circumvention emerged, more recently, as a way to resolve controls that are seen by American companies as important IP protection – but increasingly seen by the Australian government as a way of enforcing anti-competitive access and pricing restrictions.
Those issues deal with disharmony between two countries’ laws – which is one thing. In Obama’s case, however, the decision to override an ITC ruling, for the first time since 1987, curiously has one country explicitly overriding its own IP controls. The result has been a very public double-standard that has the “concerned” South Korean government considering legal action and hometown hero Samsung reinforcing its martyr status as a warrior against American IP imperialism.
Intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.It may be hard to notice from inside US borders, but from the rest of the world it’s clear that intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.
This has very real implications in a country like Australia, where exclusive-licensing deals with US media interests are regularly being used to stifle competition.
Consider Pay-TV operator Foxtel – whose cable services around 20% of Australian homes – which years ago strongarmed one-time rival Optus Vision into irrelevance by securing exclusive rights to a range of popular content. More recently, Foxtel fought off challenges by Apple’s iTunes and Netflix-like on-demand operator Quickflix, which offered Game of Thrones season 3 on an on-demand basis but will be banned from doing so for season 4 because Foxtel has bought all rights to the show.
It’s not as bad as it was decades ago – when popular soaps like Days of our Lives were broadcast in Australia many years after showing in the US – but IP restrictions are still nonetheless distorting the distribution of content outside the US. Many movies still screen in Australia months after they're on DVD in the US; many popular US TV shows air ages later in Australia if at all; and unexplained consistently higher prices for even digital media and games all carry the stink of heavy-handed American copyright imperialism.
No wonder Australia has some of the world’s highest incidence of illegal downloading: restrictively expensive, exclusive legitimate services struggle for traction based on the demands of their American rights holders. Experience shows that, when more-flexible options are available, many people stop illegal downloads – but if IP protection is used more like a stick than a carrot, nothing will change.
Apple faces other IP-related issues in the e-books market, where mooted restrictions on its pricing are being considered as a consequence of a determination around Apple’s price setting. Publishers aren’t impressed at all – but aren’t such restrictions supposed to be the price of IP abuse?
Back to the iPhone. Apple’s victory last year over Samsung was significant both for its size and its import, but Samsung’s own victory – as represented by the US ITC’s decision to support a ban – was even more significant because it showed that the US government held itself to the same standards of behaviour as it expects other countries to do.
The government threw a spanner in the works by deciding to stifle the decision of an independent judiciary. This says an American company does not have to be bound by the same intellectual-property framework that the country is imposing on the rest of the world.Apple, emboldened by its newfound protector, is making new strides and has been allowed torevive patent claims against Google’s Motorola Mobility unit. Even more problematic, a subsequentITC ruling found that Samsung infringed upon two Apple patents – and that its products could therefore be banned in the US.
Will Obama once again intervene against such a ban, as some argue it should? This would certainly support its claims that it wants to establish and reinforce a precedent that ITC decisions are more determinations of principle than determinations of an real legal consequence.
The other option is that the administration allow an ITC ban against Samsung’s products to stand, citing the importance of the integrity of IP protection measures. This would be legally allowable but morally reprehensible.
These decisions only have limited impact on most people since they relate to older Apple and Samsung products that aren’t even generally sold anymore. But the potential for important legal precedent is nonetheless significant – and unless the Obama administration is seen to be treating all players equally, its position will reek of domestic favouritism. Content-licensing issues in Australia have long shown how well this sort of hypocrisy goes down outside the US; only time will tell how it goes down inside it.
It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow
It's no secret that Surface RT and Windows RT, in addition to Windows RT on
other platforms, didn't do at the same time as Microsoft hoped. The newest
collateral harm in that failure was Nvidia's Tegra processors, which run in the
Surface RT.
Surface/Windows RT had no shortage of skeptics even when it launched, but it's feasible points could change more than time. I am not saying that this *will* take place, but that there's a affordable scenario for it. Here's how it operates.
Initial, some Microsoft business program forensics: Microsoft desires developers to write apps for the new, Modern day UI (a.k.a. Metro). Releasing Windows 8 only for Intel architecture, they need to have believed, would have created it too easy for developers to bypass Metro since standard Windows programs would currently run on it (and on Windows 7 as well as other versions). But if Surface RT were a success, developers would desire to be on it, and would opt for to create Metro apps to be able to be on each platforms.
Nicely, that didn't work. The truth is, color me surprised in the degree of reticence of developers to create Metro apps, because the sheer quantity of customers who can run them will undoubtedly be extremely huge, even though it is modest enough to become deemed a failure for Microsoft. Don't forget, any other organization on the planet would adore to have a disaster like Windows Vista, a huge selection of millions of copies of which were sold. Such is the worst you are able to expect from Windows eight.
This vacation season you'll be able to count on to find out touch-enabled Windows systems heavily promoted and Microsoft will try other promotions to get people today shopping for apps from the retailer. In truth, the failure to obtain developers writing apps for the retailer will be the single biggest issue they have. With superior apps users will undoubtedly come, and with customers great apps will come.
And if the apps do come, then the choice to get an RT device could grow to be much a lot more affordable. There desires to become a expense benefit when compared with x86 since the RT will nonetheless be significantly less capable, or it can need to demonstrate far far better battery life or some thing to offer people today a reason to purchase it, as opposed to an Intel-based program.
Depending on the overall performance and energy consumption on the most current chips from NVidia and Intel, all of that is attainable. It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow the cost and overall performance consumption gaps, and RT will lose all its raison d'etre.
But if, come holiday time or later, the Windows app choice is respectable and RT systems are less pricey than Intel-based ones, it could possibly be completely reasonable to buy a single. If they get low-cost enough, men and women may perhaps get casual about buying them.
My money's against it, but it could happen. There have already been attempts in the past to put Windows on other architectures, however they have all failed because the Intel has normally enhanced their chip functionality enough to create the price of incompatibility also higher relative for the benefits.
You could make a case that Microsoft should really have pursued it this strategy to begin with: x86 initially, other architectures after the app marketplace was solidly established. It looks like that can be the Strategy B for Microsoft and NVidia, and maybe it was built-in from the beginning.
Surface/Windows RT had no shortage of skeptics even when it launched, but it's feasible points could change more than time. I am not saying that this *will* take place, but that there's a affordable scenario for it. Here's how it operates.
Initial, some Microsoft business program forensics: Microsoft desires developers to write apps for the new, Modern day UI (a.k.a. Metro). Releasing Windows 8 only for Intel architecture, they need to have believed, would have created it too easy for developers to bypass Metro since standard Windows programs would currently run on it (and on Windows 7 as well as other versions). But if Surface RT were a success, developers would desire to be on it, and would opt for to create Metro apps to be able to be on each platforms.
Nicely, that didn't work. The truth is, color me surprised in the degree of reticence of developers to create Metro apps, because the sheer quantity of customers who can run them will undoubtedly be extremely huge, even though it is modest enough to become deemed a failure for Microsoft. Don't forget, any other organization on the planet would adore to have a disaster like Windows Vista, a huge selection of millions of copies of which were sold. Such is the worst you are able to expect from Windows eight.
This vacation season you'll be able to count on to find out touch-enabled Windows systems heavily promoted and Microsoft will try other promotions to get people today shopping for apps from the retailer. In truth, the failure to obtain developers writing apps for the retailer will be the single biggest issue they have. With superior apps users will undoubtedly come, and with customers great apps will come.
And if the apps do come, then the choice to get an RT device could grow to be much a lot more affordable. There desires to become a expense benefit when compared with x86 since the RT will nonetheless be significantly less capable, or it can need to demonstrate far far better battery life or some thing to offer people today a reason to purchase it, as opposed to an Intel-based program.
Depending on the overall performance and energy consumption on the most current chips from NVidia and Intel, all of that is attainable. It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow the cost and overall performance consumption gaps, and RT will lose all its raison d'etre.
But if, come holiday time or later, the Windows app choice is respectable and RT systems are less pricey than Intel-based ones, it could possibly be completely reasonable to buy a single. If they get low-cost enough, men and women may perhaps get casual about buying them.
My money's against it, but it could happen. There have already been attempts in the past to put Windows on other architectures, however they have all failed because the Intel has normally enhanced their chip functionality enough to create the price of incompatibility also higher relative for the benefits.
You could make a case that Microsoft should really have pursued it this strategy to begin with: x86 initially, other architectures after the app marketplace was solidly established. It looks like that can be the Strategy B for Microsoft and NVidia, and maybe it was built-in from the beginning.
2013年7月18日星期四
Facebook’s Instagram Starts Tool for Embedding Images
Facebook Inc. (FB) is unveiling tools for its Instagram service that will
let users embed photos and videos on outside websites, including blogs and news
providers, seeking to spread its influence and woo more consumers.
The new feature requires a few clicks of a mouse to place a video or photo on a Web page, Facebook said in a blog post today. The tool, designed to maintain privacy settings, is only available for content that’s already public, the Menlo Park, California-based company said.
The owner of the world’s most popular social-networking service is rolling out new features for its Instagram unit to help expand its reach on mobile devices where users are increasingly shifting their activity. Facebook, competing against services from Twitter Inc. and others, announced last month it was adding video to its photo-sharing service.
“As always, you own your photos and videos, and we want to make sure that’s understood no matter where your content appears,” the company said. “Whether you want to embed your video on your blog or a friend wants to feature your photo on a website, everyone will clearly see that your content belongs to you.”
Instagram, which Facebook bought last year for more than $700 million, has more than 130 million monthly users. More than 16 billion photos have been shared on the service.
The new feature requires a few clicks of a mouse to place a video or photo on a Web page, Facebook said in a blog post today. The tool, designed to maintain privacy settings, is only available for content that’s already public, the Menlo Park, California-based company said.
The owner of the world’s most popular social-networking service is rolling out new features for its Instagram unit to help expand its reach on mobile devices where users are increasingly shifting their activity. Facebook, competing against services from Twitter Inc. and others, announced last month it was adding video to its photo-sharing service.
“As always, you own your photos and videos, and we want to make sure that’s understood no matter where your content appears,” the company said. “Whether you want to embed your video on your blog or a friend wants to feature your photo on a website, everyone will clearly see that your content belongs to you.”
Instagram, which Facebook bought last year for more than $700 million, has more than 130 million monthly users. More than 16 billion photos have been shared on the service.
Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together
Tablets according to Microsoft’s Windows eight and Windows RT operating
systems have struggled to obtain traction so far and Paul Thurrott of the
Supersite for Windows says there’s an incredibly basic explanation for this: The
first generation of Windows tablets just is not extremely very good. To become
clear, Thurrott says that there are many touch screen Windows eight PCs and
ultrabooks that happen to be very worthy of users’ time and that shouldn’t be
overlooked. But with regards to pure tablets, he deems that every single a
single is “simply to flawed to recommend” to everyone enthusiastic about
obtaining one particular.
“Looking around my own office, this really is what I see,” Thurrott explains. “A Surface RT that's gorgeous and light and gets terrific battery life but is worthless and frustrating in use due to its horrible overall performance. A Surface Pro that is definitely thick and heavy and gets only four.five hours of battery life when offering the weird mixture of a modest screen having a incredibly high resolution. A Samsung ATIV Clever Pc 500T (Clover Trail based) that will be laughable from a performance point of view if it weren’t for that Surface RT. (In fact, it’s still terrible.) That 700T that won’t charge anymore unless I plug the energy cord in to the tablet itself … which, wait for it, you can’t do when the keyboard is connected.”
Of course, the first round of Android-based tablets had been similarly lackluster when compared with Apple’s iPad, so it’s not as even though Windows 8 is doomed as a tablet operating system. It does suggest, on the other hand, that Microsoft and its OEM partners will should place a lot of work into adding improved functionality and value to their tablets, comparable to how Nokia has tried to make Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together with the inclusion of its industry-best 41-megapixel smartphone camera in the Lumia 1020.
Thurrott is optimistic that the following generation of Windows tablets will be a significant improvement over the existing generation considering the fact that improvements to both hardware and software program will make the devices extra palatable for buyers.
“Things are going to acquire greater,” he concludes. “Intel’s new generation Core processors, codenamed Haswell, appear to have solved the battery life problem. And Windows eight.1 appears to resolve quite a few in the issues users have highlighted in Windows 8, which include desktop show scaling. Each of these improvements recommend to me that waiting is in order, as Haswell- and Windows 8.1-based tablets will probably be plentiful in just a couple of months.”
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/microsoft-office-professional-plus-2010-full-retail-pack-p-3547.html
“Looking around my own office, this really is what I see,” Thurrott explains. “A Surface RT that's gorgeous and light and gets terrific battery life but is worthless and frustrating in use due to its horrible overall performance. A Surface Pro that is definitely thick and heavy and gets only four.five hours of battery life when offering the weird mixture of a modest screen having a incredibly high resolution. A Samsung ATIV Clever Pc 500T (Clover Trail based) that will be laughable from a performance point of view if it weren’t for that Surface RT. (In fact, it’s still terrible.) That 700T that won’t charge anymore unless I plug the energy cord in to the tablet itself … which, wait for it, you can’t do when the keyboard is connected.”
Of course, the first round of Android-based tablets had been similarly lackluster when compared with Apple’s iPad, so it’s not as even though Windows 8 is doomed as a tablet operating system. It does suggest, on the other hand, that Microsoft and its OEM partners will should place a lot of work into adding improved functionality and value to their tablets, comparable to how Nokia has tried to make Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together with the inclusion of its industry-best 41-megapixel smartphone camera in the Lumia 1020.
Thurrott is optimistic that the following generation of Windows tablets will be a significant improvement over the existing generation considering the fact that improvements to both hardware and software program will make the devices extra palatable for buyers.
“Things are going to acquire greater,” he concludes. “Intel’s new generation Core processors, codenamed Haswell, appear to have solved the battery life problem. And Windows eight.1 appears to resolve quite a few in the issues users have highlighted in Windows 8, which include desktop show scaling. Each of these improvements recommend to me that waiting is in order, as Haswell- and Windows 8.1-based tablets will probably be plentiful in just a couple of months.”
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/microsoft-office-professional-plus-2010-full-retail-pack-p-3547.html
2013年7月7日星期日
Google says Moto X phone release date is July 11th
Motorola is floating invites for the introduction of its Moto X phone,
finally putting a face to the mythical product. For as long as the Android
platform has been around, the X phone was rumored as Google’s direct in-house
answer to the iPhone. Five years later Google’s subsidiary Motorola is debuting
the X phone. Beyond that fact that it is indeed real, we still know nothing
about it. And that’s even after Motorola has told is plenty about it.
Last month a Motorola rep teased the X Phone as having future features like the ability to take a pill which turns your entire body into a password, or a tattoo which does the same. If such comic book style features ever do come to the Moto X, it won’t happen next week. The X phone debuting on July 11th will be much tamer, but is still for a moment a blank slate. Rumors have pegged the X as coming in a choice of colors and custom engravings, a sideshow which still doesn’t tell us anything about the phone itself.
The question the Moto X phone must answer is twofold: what makes it more appealing than the existing Android phones on the market? And what makes it an “answer” to the iPhone such that iPhone users might be tempted to switch? Not a word of what’s leaked so far gives us even a hint at either answer. But the Moto X, the international phone of mystery, debuts on July 11th nonetheless.
Last month a Motorola rep teased the X Phone as having future features like the ability to take a pill which turns your entire body into a password, or a tattoo which does the same. If such comic book style features ever do come to the Moto X, it won’t happen next week. The X phone debuting on July 11th will be much tamer, but is still for a moment a blank slate. Rumors have pegged the X as coming in a choice of colors and custom engravings, a sideshow which still doesn’t tell us anything about the phone itself.
The question the Moto X phone must answer is twofold: what makes it more appealing than the existing Android phones on the market? And what makes it an “answer” to the iPhone such that iPhone users might be tempted to switch? Not a word of what’s leaked so far gives us even a hint at either answer. But the Moto X, the international phone of mystery, debuts on July 11th nonetheless.
For all those users accessing Evernote with a Home
Evernote now released an update for its Home windows Contact application
that brings a redesigned hub webpage, support for its Organization item, and
two-step verification to its end users. Even though a transfer that may appear
to be slight, the organization calls them major that will help create the
“best-looking, indigenous experience” on Home windows devices.
For all those users accessing Evernote with a Home windows Surface area, cellular phone, or tablet device, a completely new commence monitor are going to be shown. The company claims that it's put all of its main navigation items and account articles that a consumer may well need to have right on the one display screen.
The display screen has now been sorted into numerous sections, which include “create”, which ought to very easily allow you to develop notes, snapshots office mac home and student 2011 pack, or start out that has a file attachment. Other sections to the monitor contain shortcuts, your the latest activity, in addition to a list of your respective notes, notebooks, and tags.
Realistically, this is much more of the aesthetic change if anything at all. None of these characteristics are completely new.
Evernote Enterprise is now supported within the Windows Touch app, bringing it to par with its Android and iOS counterparts. Now, Evernote says buyers can integrate with their company’s Enterprise Library with the Get Extra area. Within the notebook segment over the hub site, consumers will see not merely their personal contents, but in addition all those for their small business.
Last of all, to make certain that person facts is correctly secured, Evernote is utilizing two-step verification. This protection evaluate was launched months after the assistance experienced an unauthorized breach in March, which resulted in the company resetting its fifty million-plus users’ passwords. In May possibly, Evernote reported that two-step verification will be at first accessible for its high quality and Company consumers. So whilst Windows Contact app buyers have that function, you may not be essentially ready to work with it.
Two-step verification adds a further security move to logging in to an Evernote account, and makes sure that the person logging into Evernote will be the rightful operator of that unique account. The login process with two-step verification enabled needs a username, password and special code that’s sent on the user’s cell phone, generated by the Google Authenticator app or printed out via the person ahead of time.
For all those users accessing Evernote with a Home windows Surface area, cellular phone, or tablet device, a completely new commence monitor are going to be shown. The company claims that it's put all of its main navigation items and account articles that a consumer may well need to have right on the one display screen.
The display screen has now been sorted into numerous sections, which include “create”, which ought to very easily allow you to develop notes, snapshots office mac home and student 2011 pack, or start out that has a file attachment. Other sections to the monitor contain shortcuts, your the latest activity, in addition to a list of your respective notes, notebooks, and tags.
Realistically, this is much more of the aesthetic change if anything at all. None of these characteristics are completely new.
Evernote Enterprise is now supported within the Windows Touch app, bringing it to par with its Android and iOS counterparts. Now, Evernote says buyers can integrate with their company’s Enterprise Library with the Get Extra area. Within the notebook segment over the hub site, consumers will see not merely their personal contents, but in addition all those for their small business.
Last of all, to make certain that person facts is correctly secured, Evernote is utilizing two-step verification. This protection evaluate was launched months after the assistance experienced an unauthorized breach in March, which resulted in the company resetting its fifty million-plus users’ passwords. In May possibly, Evernote reported that two-step verification will be at first accessible for its high quality and Company consumers. So whilst Windows Contact app buyers have that function, you may not be essentially ready to work with it.
Two-step verification adds a further security move to logging in to an Evernote account, and makes sure that the person logging into Evernote will be the rightful operator of that unique account. The login process with two-step verification enabled needs a username, password and special code that’s sent on the user’s cell phone, generated by the Google Authenticator app or printed out via the person ahead of time.
2013年6月13日星期四
NSA surveillance retrospective: AT&T, Verizon never denied it
When Internet companies were recently accused of allowing the National
Security Agency direct access to their servers, they strenuously denied it. But
when AT&T was accused of allowing the NSA direct access to its network, it
did the opposite.
Mark Klein, who worked as an AT&T technician for over 22 years, disclosed in 2006 (PDF) that he met with NSA officials and witnessed domestic Internet traffic being "diverted" through a "splitter cabinet" to secure room 641A in one of the company's San Francisco facilities. Only NSA-cleared technicians were allowed to work on equipment in the SG3 secure room, Klein said, adding that he was told similar taps existed in other major cities.
AT&T never denied it. Instead, in defending a lawsuit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the company sought to downplay the reasons NSA-controlled hardware existed on its network.
In May 2006, CNET obtained an improperly redacted PDF document (PDF) that AT&T's lawyers filed in that lawsuit. The redacted portions argued: "Although the plaintiffs ominously refer to the equipment as the 'Surveillance Configuration,' the same physical equipment could be utilized exclusively for other surveillance in full compliance with" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
CNET asked AT&T at the time: "Have you turned over information or opened up your networks to the NSA without being compelled by law?" A company spokesman would not answer the question.
A few months later, Justice Department attorneys told a federal judge (PDF) that AT&T can "neither confirm nor deny whether it was indeed cooperating with the NSA."
That's the opposite of what Internet companies including Microsoft, Google, and Facebook have done since initial reports -- which have since been shown to be incorrect -- in The Washington Post and Guardian newspapers alleged the NSA had "direct access" to the companies' servers. (The Post's editorial board yesterday acknowledged there was nothing untoward going on.)
Not only have the tech companies denied allegations of NSA access, they've done so at great length.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg provided a categorical denial, including saying that "we have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk." Google CEO Larry Page said flatly that "the U.S. government does not have direct access or a 'back door' to the information stored in our data centers." Apple, Yahoo, and Microsoft have made similar statements.
Google's chief legal officer, David Drummond, gave lengthy interviews yesterday to PBS Newshour and Fox News describing how the company complies with legal orders. CNET was the first to disclose last month that Google is currently fighting the FBI over the legality of secret "national security letters" in court in New York and San Francisco.
In addition, it turned out that the so-called PRISM program is not the name of a spy program after all: It's the name of an internal NSA software tool that's used to collate data collected through a legal process created by Congress in 2008 and last renewed in December 2012. That "702" process, overseen by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Justice Department, and Congress, requires companies to comply with orders for information on non-U.S. citizens in investigations related to "prevention of terrorism, hostile cyberactivities, or nuclear proliferation."
That seems to be why Sen. Al Franken, a Minnesota Democrat who chairs a Senate privacy subcommittee and has a reputation as an outspoken privacy advocate and critic of Silicon Valley companies, told CBS affiliate WCCO that he had been briefed on the 702 process and has no privacy concerns. "I can assure you that this isn't about spying on the American people," Franken said.
The Internet companies have asked Attorney General Eric Holder to lift secrecy restrictions on 702 orders so they can clear their name, in part by disclosing how many records they have turned over in response to legal process. Google sent an open letter to Holder yesterday, and Facebook and Microsoft have also asked the Justice Department for permission to divulge summary statistics. Holder has not responded.
By contrast, AT&T never asked for permission to disclose NSA surveillance. Instead, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Carl Nichols said during a 2006 court hearing in San Francisco that a discussion of all the "facts" about NSA surveillance could only happen in a classified setting. The Bush administration asked that the case be tossed out on "state secrets" grounds.
James Bamford, in his 2008 book "The Shadow Factory," described AT&T's participation in Bush's warrantless wiretapping program as:
For decades, AT&T and much of the rest of the telecommunications industry have had a very secret, very cozy relationship with the NSA... [NSA Director Michael Hayden] succeeded in gaining the secret cooperation of nearly all of the nation's telecommunications giants for his warrantless eavesdropping program. Within a year, engineers were busy installing highly secret, heavily locked rooms in key AT&T switches, among them Bridgeton, New York City, and the company's major West Coast central office in San Francisco. From then on the data -- including both address information and content -- would flow through the PacketScopes directly to the NSA.
Verizon, too, never sent an open letter to the federal government asking that a gag order be lifted. The company secretly hands the NSA daily logs of all customers' phone calls, according to a court order that the Guardian published last week. When USA Today disclosed this program in 2006, saying that NSA was vacuuming up phone logs, Verizon didn't deny it. Instead, a spokesman told the newspaper only that "we do not comment on national security matters."
The Bush administration confirmed the existence of warrantless wiretapping with the help of telecommunications companies when it asked Congress to grant retroactive immunity to the providers that participated. Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), the Intelligence Committee's chairman at the time, said the providers "should not be penalized for their willingness to heed the call during a national emergency" -- despite the fact that any "emergency" by then would have lasted over six years.
A 2009 book on the NSA titled "The Secret Sentry," by Matthew Aid, suggested that executives at AT&T and the other telecommunications providers knew they were violating criminal wiretapping laws. Aid wrote:
As one NSA retiree put it, "why then would they need immunity if what they did was legal?" After reading a spate of newspaper reports on the subject, a disgusted NSA official said, "They keep trying to give the telecoms a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. That tells me there is something illegal about what the companies have been doing. [The immunity deal] stinks to high heaven."
Mark Klein, who worked as an AT&T technician for over 22 years, disclosed in 2006 (PDF) that he met with NSA officials and witnessed domestic Internet traffic being "diverted" through a "splitter cabinet" to secure room 641A in one of the company's San Francisco facilities. Only NSA-cleared technicians were allowed to work on equipment in the SG3 secure room, Klein said, adding that he was told similar taps existed in other major cities.
AT&T never denied it. Instead, in defending a lawsuit brought by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the company sought to downplay the reasons NSA-controlled hardware existed on its network.
In May 2006, CNET obtained an improperly redacted PDF document (PDF) that AT&T's lawyers filed in that lawsuit. The redacted portions argued: "Although the plaintiffs ominously refer to the equipment as the 'Surveillance Configuration,' the same physical equipment could be utilized exclusively for other surveillance in full compliance with" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
CNET asked AT&T at the time: "Have you turned over information or opened up your networks to the NSA without being compelled by law?" A company spokesman would not answer the question.
A few months later, Justice Department attorneys told a federal judge (PDF) that AT&T can "neither confirm nor deny whether it was indeed cooperating with the NSA."
That's the opposite of what Internet companies including Microsoft, Google, and Facebook have done since initial reports -- which have since been shown to be incorrect -- in The Washington Post and Guardian newspapers alleged the NSA had "direct access" to the companies' servers. (The Post's editorial board yesterday acknowledged there was nothing untoward going on.)
Not only have the tech companies denied allegations of NSA access, they've done so at great length.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg provided a categorical denial, including saying that "we have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk." Google CEO Larry Page said flatly that "the U.S. government does not have direct access or a 'back door' to the information stored in our data centers." Apple, Yahoo, and Microsoft have made similar statements.
Google's chief legal officer, David Drummond, gave lengthy interviews yesterday to PBS Newshour and Fox News describing how the company complies with legal orders. CNET was the first to disclose last month that Google is currently fighting the FBI over the legality of secret "national security letters" in court in New York and San Francisco.
In addition, it turned out that the so-called PRISM program is not the name of a spy program after all: It's the name of an internal NSA software tool that's used to collate data collected through a legal process created by Congress in 2008 and last renewed in December 2012. That "702" process, overseen by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Justice Department, and Congress, requires companies to comply with orders for information on non-U.S. citizens in investigations related to "prevention of terrorism, hostile cyberactivities, or nuclear proliferation."
That seems to be why Sen. Al Franken, a Minnesota Democrat who chairs a Senate privacy subcommittee and has a reputation as an outspoken privacy advocate and critic of Silicon Valley companies, told CBS affiliate WCCO that he had been briefed on the 702 process and has no privacy concerns. "I can assure you that this isn't about spying on the American people," Franken said.
The Internet companies have asked Attorney General Eric Holder to lift secrecy restrictions on 702 orders so they can clear their name, in part by disclosing how many records they have turned over in response to legal process. Google sent an open letter to Holder yesterday, and Facebook and Microsoft have also asked the Justice Department for permission to divulge summary statistics. Holder has not responded.
By contrast, AT&T never asked for permission to disclose NSA surveillance. Instead, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Carl Nichols said during a 2006 court hearing in San Francisco that a discussion of all the "facts" about NSA surveillance could only happen in a classified setting. The Bush administration asked that the case be tossed out on "state secrets" grounds.
James Bamford, in his 2008 book "The Shadow Factory," described AT&T's participation in Bush's warrantless wiretapping program as:
For decades, AT&T and much of the rest of the telecommunications industry have had a very secret, very cozy relationship with the NSA... [NSA Director Michael Hayden] succeeded in gaining the secret cooperation of nearly all of the nation's telecommunications giants for his warrantless eavesdropping program. Within a year, engineers were busy installing highly secret, heavily locked rooms in key AT&T switches, among them Bridgeton, New York City, and the company's major West Coast central office in San Francisco. From then on the data -- including both address information and content -- would flow through the PacketScopes directly to the NSA.
Verizon, too, never sent an open letter to the federal government asking that a gag order be lifted. The company secretly hands the NSA daily logs of all customers' phone calls, according to a court order that the Guardian published last week. When USA Today disclosed this program in 2006, saying that NSA was vacuuming up phone logs, Verizon didn't deny it. Instead, a spokesman told the newspaper only that "we do not comment on national security matters."
The Bush administration confirmed the existence of warrantless wiretapping with the help of telecommunications companies when it asked Congress to grant retroactive immunity to the providers that participated. Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), the Intelligence Committee's chairman at the time, said the providers "should not be penalized for their willingness to heed the call during a national emergency" -- despite the fact that any "emergency" by then would have lasted over six years.
A 2009 book on the NSA titled "The Secret Sentry," by Matthew Aid, suggested that executives at AT&T and the other telecommunications providers knew they were violating criminal wiretapping laws. Aid wrote:
As one NSA retiree put it, "why then would they need immunity if what they did was legal?" After reading a spate of newspaper reports on the subject, a disgusted NSA official said, "They keep trying to give the telecoms a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. That tells me there is something illegal about what the companies have been doing. [The immunity deal] stinks to high heaven."
The screenshots disclosed Microsoft's operate
Apple famously misplaced an apple iphone four prototype in the bar,
sparking a hunt for that people linked to the loss and sale of your handset.
Microsoft has also shed a cellphone, 1 working a foreseeable future Windows
Cellular phone 'Blue' edition of its cell software package. A Reddit user posted
screenshots and data received with the system about the weekend, making
fascination in unannounced attributes for Windows Cell phone which integrated an
early prototype of a notification middle. The Verge achieved out for the Reddit
consumer in dilemma, which will be the tale of your shed magic formula Home
windows Mobile phone.
Jeremiah Wong ordered a Lumia 920 from eBay on June 5th from the vendor situated in Seattle. "The cellphone within the photographs looked distinctive," claims Wong, talking completely for the Verge. "Mainly the start Screen had the comments hub, also etching over the back again that browse MSFT." Wong at first believed the gadget was a developer kit due to the fact it had the particular etching alongside a cracked monitor, but it really was a lot a lot more critical. So significant in actual fact that Microsoft required it back.
After publishing screenshots of your software package working about the machine, and accidentally revealing his cellphone variety from the procedure, Wong was contacted by Microsoft's lawful team. Microsoft locked the mobile phone remotely and requested that Wong consider down his images from his Flickr account. "Apparently the guy who owned it lost it on the bus. It had been then picked up and marketed," he suggests. Rather than pursuing Wong, Microsoft has made available to reimburse him for the expense of the unit as well as ship him a replacement cell phone. "I was incredibly astonished on the lack of intimidation and in many cases extra surprised at their accommodation," says Wong.
Resources acquainted with Microsoft's Windows Phone designs have revealed into the Verge the software is early prototype function for an upcoming update codenamed Blue. Describing the application, Wong claims it experienced "pretty much all the things he needed," but that "a couple factors necessary work nevertheless." The screenshots disclosed Microsoft's operate on the much-requested notification heart for Windows Mobile phone and a few advancements to multitasking and the basic usability with the application perspective.
Given that the improvements are only at the prototyping phase, it is really unlikely that all of them will likely be integrated inside of a ultimate version of Home windows Telephone Blue. The Verge understands this update isn't scheduled for launch right until early next 12 months. While the screenshots present a notification center as element of a independent software, it's likely this implementation ?a if it ships whatsoever ?a will change by the time Windows Cellular phone Blue is released.
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/office-professional-plus-2013-full-retail-pack-p-3600.html
Jeremiah Wong ordered a Lumia 920 from eBay on June 5th from the vendor situated in Seattle. "The cellphone within the photographs looked distinctive," claims Wong, talking completely for the Verge. "Mainly the start Screen had the comments hub, also etching over the back again that browse MSFT." Wong at first believed the gadget was a developer kit due to the fact it had the particular etching alongside a cracked monitor, but it really was a lot a lot more critical. So significant in actual fact that Microsoft required it back.
After publishing screenshots of your software package working about the machine, and accidentally revealing his cellphone variety from the procedure, Wong was contacted by Microsoft's lawful team. Microsoft locked the mobile phone remotely and requested that Wong consider down his images from his Flickr account. "Apparently the guy who owned it lost it on the bus. It had been then picked up and marketed," he suggests. Rather than pursuing Wong, Microsoft has made available to reimburse him for the expense of the unit as well as ship him a replacement cell phone. "I was incredibly astonished on the lack of intimidation and in many cases extra surprised at their accommodation," says Wong.
Resources acquainted with Microsoft's Windows Phone designs have revealed into the Verge the software is early prototype function for an upcoming update codenamed Blue. Describing the application, Wong claims it experienced "pretty much all the things he needed," but that "a couple factors necessary work nevertheless." The screenshots disclosed Microsoft's operate on the much-requested notification heart for Windows Mobile phone and a few advancements to multitasking and the basic usability with the application perspective.
Given that the improvements are only at the prototyping phase, it is really unlikely that all of them will likely be integrated inside of a ultimate version of Home windows Telephone Blue. The Verge understands this update isn't scheduled for launch right until early next 12 months. While the screenshots present a notification center as element of a independent software, it's likely this implementation ?a if it ships whatsoever ?a will change by the time Windows Cellular phone Blue is released.
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/office-professional-plus-2013-full-retail-pack-p-3600.html
2013年6月10日星期一
Will iOS 7′s Activation Lock really deter iPhone theft?
During the massive WWDC keynote today the folks at Apple walked the
audience of developers through several new features of iOS 7, the operating
system for iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch devices. Toward the end of the keynote
one really interesting and useful feature got a mention but barely any talk
time: Activation Lock. There were no demos or anything, but Activation Lock
might be one of the most important updates to iOS in a long time.
Activation Lock builds on the security and theft recovery already available to iOS devices in the form of Find My iPhone. This feature turned on, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and Mac owners can locate a missing device using another compatible Apple product. The service shows where your missing device is on a map, will play a sound to help you locate it if it’s lost in your house, and will even remotely lock your device or wipe it to protect your data. All of that is awesome, but what if your iOS device is not just misplaced, but stolen? If the thief is at all smart (and hey, some aren’t…) they won’t give you a chance to find your iPhone or iPad. Instead of leaving Find My iPhone on, the thief might turn it off and/or factory reset/wipe the device themselves. If the goal is to resell the device and not steal your personal information, this method is handy.
Well, until now. With Activation Lock the iOS device will continue to display the Lock screen “please call me to return my iPhone” message even after the phone is wiped by the thief. No one will be able to re-activate or get into the device without the original owner’s Apple ID and password. Don’t have that? Enjoy your brick of a phone.
This feature is only available for devices compatible with iOS 7. That means the iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPad 2, iPad 3, iPad 4, the iPad Mini, and the iPod Touch fifth generation and up are all compatible. Everyone else will need to keep a better eye on their stuff.
There are a few flaws in this system, of course. Find My iPhone only works when the device is connected to Wi-Fi or mobile broadband. There aren’t many deep details available on Activation Lock right now, so it’s hard to determine under what circumstances it will work – is it on automatically when iOS 7 is activated? If Find My iPhone can’t connect to the device will Activation Lock work? What if you want to sell the device yourself later on? As iOS 7 gets closer to release we hope to get the answers.
Apple is touting this new security feature as a theft deterrent, but how long will it take for iPhone and iPad thieves to catch on? And will they continue to steal devices and just sell them for parts – it’s not as lucrative, but better than nothing. I wonder how many will end up calling the owner in frustration and giving it back?
Activation Lock builds on the security and theft recovery already available to iOS devices in the form of Find My iPhone. This feature turned on, iPhone, iPad, iPod touch, and Mac owners can locate a missing device using another compatible Apple product. The service shows where your missing device is on a map, will play a sound to help you locate it if it’s lost in your house, and will even remotely lock your device or wipe it to protect your data. All of that is awesome, but what if your iOS device is not just misplaced, but stolen? If the thief is at all smart (and hey, some aren’t…) they won’t give you a chance to find your iPhone or iPad. Instead of leaving Find My iPhone on, the thief might turn it off and/or factory reset/wipe the device themselves. If the goal is to resell the device and not steal your personal information, this method is handy.
Well, until now. With Activation Lock the iOS device will continue to display the Lock screen “please call me to return my iPhone” message even after the phone is wiped by the thief. No one will be able to re-activate or get into the device without the original owner’s Apple ID and password. Don’t have that? Enjoy your brick of a phone.
This feature is only available for devices compatible with iOS 7. That means the iPhone 4, iPhone 4S, iPhone 5, iPad 2, iPad 3, iPad 4, the iPad Mini, and the iPod Touch fifth generation and up are all compatible. Everyone else will need to keep a better eye on their stuff.
There are a few flaws in this system, of course. Find My iPhone only works when the device is connected to Wi-Fi or mobile broadband. There aren’t many deep details available on Activation Lock right now, so it’s hard to determine under what circumstances it will work – is it on automatically when iOS 7 is activated? If Find My iPhone can’t connect to the device will Activation Lock work? What if you want to sell the device yourself later on? As iOS 7 gets closer to release we hope to get the answers.
Apple is touting this new security feature as a theft deterrent, but how long will it take for iPhone and iPad thieves to catch on? And will they continue to steal devices and just sell them for parts – it’s not as lucrative, but better than nothing. I wonder how many will end up calling the owner in frustration and giving it back?
Apparently the man who owned it lost it over a bus
Apple famously missing an iphone four prototype within a bar, sparking a
hunt for the people today involved with the loss and sale with the handset.
Microsoft has also lost a cellular phone, one particular jogging a foreseeable
future Windows Mobile phone 'Blue' version of its cell computer software. A
Reddit user posted screenshots and data attained in the machine around the
weekend, building curiosity in unannounced characteristics for Windows Mobile
phone which involved an early prototype of the notification middle. The Verge
arrived at out to the Reddit person in issue, and this will be the tale in the
misplaced magic formula Windows Telephone.
Jeremiah Wong obtained a Lumia 920 from eBay on June 5th from the vendor located in Seattle. "The cell phone from the pictures seemed distinct," states Wong, talking solely into the Verge. "Mainly the start Display screen had the feed-back hub, also etching to the back again that read MSFT." Wong initially believed the system was a developer package due to the fact it had the unique etching along with a cracked monitor, nonetheless it was a whole lot additional essential. So important in fact that Microsoft preferred it again.
Immediately after posting screenshots of your program managing to the device, and accidentally revealing his cellphone amount within the course of action, Wong was contacted by Microsoft's legal group. Microsoft locked the phone remotely and requested that Wong take down his pictures from his Flickr account. "Apparently the man who owned it lost it over a bus. It was then picked up and marketed," he suggests. As opposed to pursuing Wong, Microsoft has provided to reimburse him for the price of the unit as well as ship him a replacement cell phone. "I was unbelievably astonished in the lack of intimidation and in some cases much more shocked at their lodging," claims Wong.
Sources familiar with Microsoft's Windows Mobile phone programs have uncovered into the Verge which the software package is early prototype perform for an approaching update codenamed Blue. Describing the software package, Wong claims it had "pretty much every thing he required," but that "a handful of matters necessary function nevertheless." The screenshots unveiled Microsoft's get the job done on the much-requested notification heart for Windows Cell phone plus some advancements to multitasking as well as the typical usability of the app check out.
Since the improvements are only within the prototyping period, it is not likely that all of these will probably be incorporated inside of a closing version of Home windows Phone Blue. The Verge understands this update isn't scheduled for release until eventually early following yr. Though the screenshots exhibit a notification middle as section of a separate application, it really is very likely this implementation ?a if it ships in the slightest degree ?a will improve because of the time Windows Cell phone Blue is unveiled.
Jeremiah Wong obtained a Lumia 920 from eBay on June 5th from the vendor located in Seattle. "The cell phone from the pictures seemed distinct," states Wong, talking solely into the Verge. "Mainly the start Display screen had the feed-back hub, also etching to the back again that read MSFT." Wong initially believed the system was a developer package due to the fact it had the unique etching along with a cracked monitor, nonetheless it was a whole lot additional essential. So important in fact that Microsoft preferred it again.
Immediately after posting screenshots of your program managing to the device, and accidentally revealing his cellphone amount within the course of action, Wong was contacted by Microsoft's legal group. Microsoft locked the phone remotely and requested that Wong take down his pictures from his Flickr account. "Apparently the man who owned it lost it over a bus. It was then picked up and marketed," he suggests. As opposed to pursuing Wong, Microsoft has provided to reimburse him for the price of the unit as well as ship him a replacement cell phone. "I was unbelievably astonished in the lack of intimidation and in some cases much more shocked at their lodging," claims Wong.
Sources familiar with Microsoft's Windows Mobile phone programs have uncovered into the Verge which the software package is early prototype perform for an approaching update codenamed Blue. Describing the software package, Wong claims it had "pretty much every thing he required," but that "a handful of matters necessary function nevertheless." The screenshots unveiled Microsoft's get the job done on the much-requested notification heart for Windows Cell phone plus some advancements to multitasking as well as the typical usability of the app check out.
Since the improvements are only within the prototyping period, it is not likely that all of these will probably be incorporated inside of a closing version of Home windows Phone Blue. The Verge understands this update isn't scheduled for release until eventually early following yr. Though the screenshots exhibit a notification middle as section of a separate application, it really is very likely this implementation ?a if it ships in the slightest degree ?a will improve because of the time Windows Cell phone Blue is unveiled.
2013年6月2日星期日
Acer all-in-one will run Android
Less Windows, more Android. Acer is about to give us a taste of this trend,
as Android PCs begin to creep onto the market.
The Acer DA220HQL comes with a 21.5-inch multi-touch display 1,920x1,080 display, Android 4.0, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 dual-core ARM Coretex-A9 processor.
It also includes 1GB of memory, 8GB internal storage, front-facing camera, built-in speakers, Wi-Fi, Micro-HDMI, Micro USB 2.0, and wireless keyboard and mouse.
The new AIO will go for less than $400 at some resellers, though most listings put it about $425. Some are higher than $425.
And that's the appeal of Android. Systems sans Windows 8 can be priced lower and require less hardware.
The Acer DA220HQL comes with a 21.5-inch multi-touch display 1,920x1,080 display, Android 4.0, and a Texas Instruments OMAP 4430 dual-core ARM Coretex-A9 processor.
It also includes 1GB of memory, 8GB internal storage, front-facing camera, built-in speakers, Wi-Fi, Micro-HDMI, Micro USB 2.0, and wireless keyboard and mouse.
The new AIO will go for less than $400 at some resellers, though most listings put it about $425. Some are higher than $425.
And that's the appeal of Android. Systems sans Windows 8 can be priced lower and require less hardware.
As a outcome numerous buyers discover
World Pc profits plunged 14% year-on-year in the initial quarter of 2013,
and far of your blame was heaped around the lukewarm reception to Windows 8.
Microsoft's new operating process was intended to offer a boost for the ailing
sector but has ostensibly unsuccessful to complete so.
Microsoft claims that it's presently shifted one hundred million Windows 8 licenses, which matches the income rate of Home windows seven, but six months into the release from the former, NetApplications studies that Home windows 8 only incorporates a three.82% share in the desktop OS market place, although Home windows seven and Home windows XP even now dominate with forty four.72% and 38.31% respectively. Back again when Home windows seven was also 6 months aged it already had an 11.94% share, NetApplications claims.
"Users are locating Home windows eight to supply a compromised encounter that does not excel both for a new cellular interface or inside of a vintage desktop interface," explained Jay Chou, senior investigation analyst, in accordance to Reuters. "As a outcome, numerous buyers discover a drop within the regular Laptop practical experience without the need of attaining a lot from new capabilities like contact. The end result is always that lots of individuals are anxious about upgrading to Windows 8, to say very little of company end users who're still just moving into Home windows seven."
Microsoft, to its credit, is getting lively measures to handle the numerous consumer grievances about Home windows 8. The tech big will debut the free Windows eight.one update (code-named "Blue") later on this year, which will permit users the option of launching the OS using a button about the bottom left-hand corner in their screens that is certainly related to your legendary 'Start' menu of prior Windows iterations.
Will the update alter the destiny of Home windows 8? Richard Windsor, founding father of the mobile-focused site Radio Totally free Cellular in addition to a previous tech analyst at Nomura, suggests that it's nearly irrelevant, due to the fact now that Apple has stopped getting market place share inside the Personal computer planet, Laptop customers will at some point should improve to Windows 8, presented the Microsoft hegemony of the market place. And so the Redmond, Washington-based business is not going to be far too fearful about the fate of Home windows eight at this time.
The proposition is of the Microsoft ecosystem, "a unified expertise across all equipment that may be integrated and straightforward to implement. But handy and pleasant is just not what customers see. Likely potential buyers are introduced with what I consult with as Blue Squares of Loss of life," he states, noting the issue went away with Home windows 7 but regrettably resurfaced with Home windows 8.
"When a consumer picks up a Windows Mobile phone or simply a Windows 8 product at retail they is presented with a monitor full of blue or crimson squares labeled People, Maps, New music, Online games and so on. Strike any one of those squares and nothing is uncovered. In most cases, the machine will not be even connected. Here is the equivalent of heading right into a supercar showroom with $100,000 as part of your again pocket and never currently being in a position to own a check travel," opined Windsor.
"Furthermore, Microsoft gives a dependable practical experience from console / Tv set via Personal computer, pill and phablet many of the way to the cellphone. These equipment are under no circumstances exhibited jointly and thus likely customers never ever comprehend this is surely an ecosystem for each and every product. How on this planet Microsoft expects user to order Home windows Phones and Windows 8, when it does not exhibit them what it can be capable of and how huge its scope is, is a mystery."
"As for [Original Gear Manufacturers], the most effective matter they're able to do is arrive up with machines which are innovative, inexpensive, and that provide new powerful experiences in just the Home windows 8 ecosystem. You'll be able to see this along with the increase of convertibles, ultrabooks, along with the upcoming launch of processors like Intel's Haswell, which purports to substantially increase the battery lifetime of computer systems," Haynes included. "If they don't, the OEMs will find progressively more people actively searching for to abandon Windows 8 and starting the go in the direction of tablet computing as a substitute of laptops and desktops.
Microsoft claims that it's presently shifted one hundred million Windows 8 licenses, which matches the income rate of Home windows seven, but six months into the release from the former, NetApplications studies that Home windows 8 only incorporates a three.82% share in the desktop OS market place, although Home windows seven and Home windows XP even now dominate with forty four.72% and 38.31% respectively. Back again when Home windows seven was also 6 months aged it already had an 11.94% share, NetApplications claims.
"Users are locating Home windows eight to supply a compromised encounter that does not excel both for a new cellular interface or inside of a vintage desktop interface," explained Jay Chou, senior investigation analyst, in accordance to Reuters. "As a outcome, numerous buyers discover a drop within the regular Laptop practical experience without the need of attaining a lot from new capabilities like contact. The end result is always that lots of individuals are anxious about upgrading to Windows 8, to say very little of company end users who're still just moving into Home windows seven."
Microsoft, to its credit, is getting lively measures to handle the numerous consumer grievances about Home windows 8. The tech big will debut the free Windows eight.one update (code-named "Blue") later on this year, which will permit users the option of launching the OS using a button about the bottom left-hand corner in their screens that is certainly related to your legendary 'Start' menu of prior Windows iterations.
Will the update alter the destiny of Home windows 8? Richard Windsor, founding father of the mobile-focused site Radio Totally free Cellular in addition to a previous tech analyst at Nomura, suggests that it's nearly irrelevant, due to the fact now that Apple has stopped getting market place share inside the Personal computer planet, Laptop customers will at some point should improve to Windows 8, presented the Microsoft hegemony of the market place. And so the Redmond, Washington-based business is not going to be far too fearful about the fate of Home windows eight at this time.
The proposition is of the Microsoft ecosystem, "a unified expertise across all equipment that may be integrated and straightforward to implement. But handy and pleasant is just not what customers see. Likely potential buyers are introduced with what I consult with as Blue Squares of Loss of life," he states, noting the issue went away with Home windows 7 but regrettably resurfaced with Home windows 8.
"When a consumer picks up a Windows Mobile phone or simply a Windows 8 product at retail they is presented with a monitor full of blue or crimson squares labeled People, Maps, New music, Online games and so on. Strike any one of those squares and nothing is uncovered. In most cases, the machine will not be even connected. Here is the equivalent of heading right into a supercar showroom with $100,000 as part of your again pocket and never currently being in a position to own a check travel," opined Windsor.
"Furthermore, Microsoft gives a dependable practical experience from console / Tv set via Personal computer, pill and phablet many of the way to the cellphone. These equipment are under no circumstances exhibited jointly and thus likely customers never ever comprehend this is surely an ecosystem for each and every product. How on this planet Microsoft expects user to order Home windows Phones and Windows 8, when it does not exhibit them what it can be capable of and how huge its scope is, is a mystery."
"As for [Original Gear Manufacturers], the most effective matter they're able to do is arrive up with machines which are innovative, inexpensive, and that provide new powerful experiences in just the Home windows 8 ecosystem. You'll be able to see this along with the increase of convertibles, ultrabooks, along with the upcoming launch of processors like Intel's Haswell, which purports to substantially increase the battery lifetime of computer systems," Haynes included. "If they don't, the OEMs will find progressively more people actively searching for to abandon Windows 8 and starting the go in the direction of tablet computing as a substitute of laptops and desktops.
订阅：
博文 (Atom)