Just days before the expected launch of two new much-anticipated iPhones on
Tuesday, more images have emerged of what's purported to be Apple's
next-generation iPad.
Sonny Dickson, who is a frequent leaker of all things Apple, on Sunday
posted an extensive gallery of alleged 5th-generation iPad parts, including an
assembled shell that appears identical to previous image leaks. If legitimate,
the photos appear to buttress previous image leaks and rumors that the iPad 5
will take many of its design cues from the iPad Mini, with a thinner profile and
more rounded edges and corners.
Previous purported leaks from Dickson included images of what appeared to
be the front panelof the iPad 5.
While Apple has planned a media event for Tuesday at which many expect new
iPhones to be unveiled, company observers don't expect a new iPad 5 or iPad Mini
to be announced at the event. "It contradicts everything we've heard thus far
about Apple's fall iOS Device launch plans from our sources," 9to5Mac
concluded.
2013年9月8日星期日
In actual fact even finding the Desktop
Now, that doesn't imply XP will suddenly quit working. You may preserve
working with it if you would like, but I would not suggest it.
End of life suggests Microsoft will not be releasing any a lot more security updates to the typical user. Any security flaws that hackers discover will not be fixed. Your computer is going to be a sitting duck, even with safety software installed. Click here to see what no cost safety software I advise.
I know quite a few die-hard XP users are cynical about this news. They believe Microsoft is trying to force men and women acquire new computer systems. Microsoft is in business to create cash, so it does want men and women to upgrade. But in Microsoft's defense, this isn't a thing special for XP.
Microsoft has completed the same with Windows 95, 98 and Me. Vista's end of life is April 11, 2017 and Windows 7's is January 14, 2020. In reality, Microsoft extended XP's end-of-life date quite a few times. XP should happen to be gone years ago.
Here's a exciting reality: XP first appeared at the finish of 2001. As late as 2010, computer systems have been still sold with XP installed. Windows Vista, which arrived 6 years following XP, only lasted till 2011.
Should you contemplate it, XP are going to be nearly 13 years old. Like a teenager, it's getting problems adjusting to the planet. In spite of a major overhaul with Service Pack three, XP just wasn't built for the contemporary digital age.
It really is missing essential security capabilities introduced in Windows Vista. It can't assistance the latest, safest and most Web-compatible versions of Web Explorer. It can't take full benefit with the most recent hardware advances.
It really is becoming increasingly frustrating for shoppers and third-party companies. Several third-party providers would really like to cease supporting XP. It takes many money and time to produce confident applications and hardware function on each version of Windows.
This even impacts the online world. Internet developers will likely be overjoyed to find out XP-only World-wide-web Explorer versions 6, 7 and eight go away. These versions are so far behind other browsers, you virtually need to write another website just for them.
It's going to become a significant change for many folks. In most situations it really is going to imply a new computer, upgraded software and possibly new accessories like printers and scanners.
Until final year, upgrading would not happen to be pretty so bad. Windows 7 was nevertheless relatively close to Windows XP in look and how it worked. In reality, I count on Windows 7 to be the next Windows version that individuals stick with for very a although.
Now, even so, Windows 8 is definitely the only operating system out there on new computer systems. If you try it, you are going to discover that it is radically distinct from prior Windows versions.
The interface was meant for touch-screen tablets and doesn't work that effectively with keyboard and mouse. In actual fact, even finding the Desktop is an adventure in itself.
The Windows 8.1 update coming out subsequent month will enable you to bring back several of the old Windows. Microsoft will even contain a tutorial on tips on how to use Windows eight - ultimately. But it is nonetheless a steep learning curve, specifically windows 7 ultimate activation key coming from XP. Click here to learn a lot more about producing essentially the most of the Windows eight.1 update.
You'll be able to uncover copies of Windows 7 for sale on the internet. You'll be able to set up it on your existing computer - assuming it isn't also old. You may also get a Windows eight pc and downgrade.
Just be aware which you can not do an in-place upgrade from XP to 7. You will have to wipe your challenging drive and install Windows 7 from scratch. For those who get an upgrade version of Windows 7, you'll need Windows XP installation discs to prove that you just are eligible. Whatever you do, commence planning now. April will be coming up quick and also you don't want to be still working with XP when it arrives.
Now, you may hear there's a slim opportunity Microsoft could continue releasing safety updates for XP. It's under contract to some organizations to provide them for the subsequent few years. Nonetheless, that's a paid choice and I wouldn't hold your breath that Microsoft will make these updates public.
End of life suggests Microsoft will not be releasing any a lot more security updates to the typical user. Any security flaws that hackers discover will not be fixed. Your computer is going to be a sitting duck, even with safety software installed. Click here to see what no cost safety software I advise.
I know quite a few die-hard XP users are cynical about this news. They believe Microsoft is trying to force men and women acquire new computer systems. Microsoft is in business to create cash, so it does want men and women to upgrade. But in Microsoft's defense, this isn't a thing special for XP.
Microsoft has completed the same with Windows 95, 98 and Me. Vista's end of life is April 11, 2017 and Windows 7's is January 14, 2020. In reality, Microsoft extended XP's end-of-life date quite a few times. XP should happen to be gone years ago.
Here's a exciting reality: XP first appeared at the finish of 2001. As late as 2010, computer systems have been still sold with XP installed. Windows Vista, which arrived 6 years following XP, only lasted till 2011.
Should you contemplate it, XP are going to be nearly 13 years old. Like a teenager, it's getting problems adjusting to the planet. In spite of a major overhaul with Service Pack three, XP just wasn't built for the contemporary digital age.
It really is missing essential security capabilities introduced in Windows Vista. It can't assistance the latest, safest and most Web-compatible versions of Web Explorer. It can't take full benefit with the most recent hardware advances.
It really is becoming increasingly frustrating for shoppers and third-party companies. Several third-party providers would really like to cease supporting XP. It takes many money and time to produce confident applications and hardware function on each version of Windows.
This even impacts the online world. Internet developers will likely be overjoyed to find out XP-only World-wide-web Explorer versions 6, 7 and eight go away. These versions are so far behind other browsers, you virtually need to write another website just for them.
It's going to become a significant change for many folks. In most situations it really is going to imply a new computer, upgraded software and possibly new accessories like printers and scanners.
Until final year, upgrading would not happen to be pretty so bad. Windows 7 was nevertheless relatively close to Windows XP in look and how it worked. In reality, I count on Windows 7 to be the next Windows version that individuals stick with for very a although.
Now, even so, Windows 8 is definitely the only operating system out there on new computer systems. If you try it, you are going to discover that it is radically distinct from prior Windows versions.
The interface was meant for touch-screen tablets and doesn't work that effectively with keyboard and mouse. In actual fact, even finding the Desktop is an adventure in itself.
The Windows 8.1 update coming out subsequent month will enable you to bring back several of the old Windows. Microsoft will even contain a tutorial on tips on how to use Windows eight - ultimately. But it is nonetheless a steep learning curve, specifically windows 7 ultimate activation key coming from XP. Click here to learn a lot more about producing essentially the most of the Windows eight.1 update.
You'll be able to uncover copies of Windows 7 for sale on the internet. You'll be able to set up it on your existing computer - assuming it isn't also old. You may also get a Windows eight pc and downgrade.
Just be aware which you can not do an in-place upgrade from XP to 7. You will have to wipe your challenging drive and install Windows 7 from scratch. For those who get an upgrade version of Windows 7, you'll need Windows XP installation discs to prove that you just are eligible. Whatever you do, commence planning now. April will be coming up quick and also you don't want to be still working with XP when it arrives.
Now, you may hear there's a slim opportunity Microsoft could continue releasing safety updates for XP. It's under contract to some organizations to provide them for the subsequent few years. Nonetheless, that's a paid choice and I wouldn't hold your breath that Microsoft will make these updates public.
2013年8月12日星期一
Obama’s Apple patent pardon reflects global IP hypocrisy
It may have seemed pragmatically necessary for US President Barack Obama to
override the US International Trade Commission’s (ITC’s) decision to ban certain
iPhone imports, after South Korean giant Samsung’s patent-infringement victory
against Apple looked to threaten the iOS dripfeed. And yet, in overriding the
rule of justice Obama has exposed a root hypocrisy that weakens America’s moral
authority to assert intellectual property control outside of its borders.
This it does, with fierce regularity. The spread of American culture – and the IP related to it – is hardly a new story. And, given the facility with which protected content can now be disseminated across the Internet, American IP-protection interests have been working overtime to assert their rights.
Australia, for one, has seen the results of this first-hand, both in action – for example, the ultimately unsuccessful action by American entertainment interests against major ISP iiNet on allegations it was facilitating mass piracy – and in word, such as the requirements in the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement that Australia harmonise its IP protection laws to those of the US. This is the reason Australian copyright now endures for 70 years after the death of a work’s creator, as opposed to 50 years before the FTA.
Similar issues have persisted in negotiations around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), in which Australian authorities have had to consider the legal status of geoblocking by largely American content interests such as Hulu and Netflix. Advocacy ofgeoblocking circumvention emerged, more recently, as a way to resolve controls that are seen by American companies as important IP protection – but increasingly seen by the Australian government as a way of enforcing anti-competitive access and pricing restrictions.
Those issues deal with disharmony between two countries’ laws – which is one thing. In Obama’s case, however, the decision to override an ITC ruling, for the first time since 1987, curiously has one country explicitly overriding its own IP controls. The result has been a very public double-standard that has the “concerned” South Korean government considering legal action and hometown hero Samsung reinforcing its martyr status as a warrior against American IP imperialism.
Intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.It may be hard to notice from inside US borders, but from the rest of the world it’s clear that intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.
This has very real implications in a country like Australia, where exclusive-licensing deals with US media interests are regularly being used to stifle competition.
Consider Pay-TV operator Foxtel – whose cable services around 20% of Australian homes – which years ago strongarmed one-time rival Optus Vision into irrelevance by securing exclusive rights to a range of popular content. More recently, Foxtel fought off challenges by Apple’s iTunes and Netflix-like on-demand operator Quickflix, which offered Game of Thrones season 3 on an on-demand basis but will be banned from doing so for season 4 because Foxtel has bought all rights to the show.
It’s not as bad as it was decades ago – when popular soaps like Days of our Lives were broadcast in Australia many years after showing in the US – but IP restrictions are still nonetheless distorting the distribution of content outside the US. Many movies still screen in Australia months after they're on DVD in the US; many popular US TV shows air ages later in Australia if at all; and unexplained consistently higher prices for even digital media and games all carry the stink of heavy-handed American copyright imperialism.
No wonder Australia has some of the world’s highest incidence of illegal downloading: restrictively expensive, exclusive legitimate services struggle for traction based on the demands of their American rights holders. Experience shows that, when more-flexible options are available, many people stop illegal downloads – but if IP protection is used more like a stick than a carrot, nothing will change.
Apple faces other IP-related issues in the e-books market, where mooted restrictions on its pricing are being considered as a consequence of a determination around Apple’s price setting. Publishers aren’t impressed at all – but aren’t such restrictions supposed to be the price of IP abuse?
Back to the iPhone. Apple’s victory last year over Samsung was significant both for its size and its import, but Samsung’s own victory – as represented by the US ITC’s decision to support a ban – was even more significant because it showed that the US government held itself to the same standards of behaviour as it expects other countries to do.
The government threw a spanner in the works by deciding to stifle the decision of an independent judiciary. This says an American company does not have to be bound by the same intellectual-property framework that the country is imposing on the rest of the world.Apple, emboldened by its newfound protector, is making new strides and has been allowed torevive patent claims against Google’s Motorola Mobility unit. Even more problematic, a subsequentITC ruling found that Samsung infringed upon two Apple patents – and that its products could therefore be banned in the US.
Will Obama once again intervene against such a ban, as some argue it should? This would certainly support its claims that it wants to establish and reinforce a precedent that ITC decisions are more determinations of principle than determinations of an real legal consequence.
The other option is that the administration allow an ITC ban against Samsung’s products to stand, citing the importance of the integrity of IP protection measures. This would be legally allowable but morally reprehensible.
These decisions only have limited impact on most people since they relate to older Apple and Samsung products that aren’t even generally sold anymore. But the potential for important legal precedent is nonetheless significant – and unless the Obama administration is seen to be treating all players equally, its position will reek of domestic favouritism. Content-licensing issues in Australia have long shown how well this sort of hypocrisy goes down outside the US; only time will tell how it goes down inside it.
This it does, with fierce regularity. The spread of American culture – and the IP related to it – is hardly a new story. And, given the facility with which protected content can now be disseminated across the Internet, American IP-protection interests have been working overtime to assert their rights.
Australia, for one, has seen the results of this first-hand, both in action – for example, the ultimately unsuccessful action by American entertainment interests against major ISP iiNet on allegations it was facilitating mass piracy – and in word, such as the requirements in the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement that Australia harmonise its IP protection laws to those of the US. This is the reason Australian copyright now endures for 70 years after the death of a work’s creator, as opposed to 50 years before the FTA.
Similar issues have persisted in negotiations around the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), in which Australian authorities have had to consider the legal status of geoblocking by largely American content interests such as Hulu and Netflix. Advocacy ofgeoblocking circumvention emerged, more recently, as a way to resolve controls that are seen by American companies as important IP protection – but increasingly seen by the Australian government as a way of enforcing anti-competitive access and pricing restrictions.
Those issues deal with disharmony between two countries’ laws – which is one thing. In Obama’s case, however, the decision to override an ITC ruling, for the first time since 1987, curiously has one country explicitly overriding its own IP controls. The result has been a very public double-standard that has the “concerned” South Korean government considering legal action and hometown hero Samsung reinforcing its martyr status as a warrior against American IP imperialism.
Intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.It may be hard to notice from inside US borders, but from the rest of the world it’s clear that intellectual property is the new measles of American colonialism: just as the Europeans wiped out native South American populations during their expansionist search for gold, so too are American intellectual-property lawyers bulldozing over foreign sovereignty in the guise of free trade agreements.
This has very real implications in a country like Australia, where exclusive-licensing deals with US media interests are regularly being used to stifle competition.
Consider Pay-TV operator Foxtel – whose cable services around 20% of Australian homes – which years ago strongarmed one-time rival Optus Vision into irrelevance by securing exclusive rights to a range of popular content. More recently, Foxtel fought off challenges by Apple’s iTunes and Netflix-like on-demand operator Quickflix, which offered Game of Thrones season 3 on an on-demand basis but will be banned from doing so for season 4 because Foxtel has bought all rights to the show.
It’s not as bad as it was decades ago – when popular soaps like Days of our Lives were broadcast in Australia many years after showing in the US – but IP restrictions are still nonetheless distorting the distribution of content outside the US. Many movies still screen in Australia months after they're on DVD in the US; many popular US TV shows air ages later in Australia if at all; and unexplained consistently higher prices for even digital media and games all carry the stink of heavy-handed American copyright imperialism.
No wonder Australia has some of the world’s highest incidence of illegal downloading: restrictively expensive, exclusive legitimate services struggle for traction based on the demands of their American rights holders. Experience shows that, when more-flexible options are available, many people stop illegal downloads – but if IP protection is used more like a stick than a carrot, nothing will change.
Apple faces other IP-related issues in the e-books market, where mooted restrictions on its pricing are being considered as a consequence of a determination around Apple’s price setting. Publishers aren’t impressed at all – but aren’t such restrictions supposed to be the price of IP abuse?
Back to the iPhone. Apple’s victory last year over Samsung was significant both for its size and its import, but Samsung’s own victory – as represented by the US ITC’s decision to support a ban – was even more significant because it showed that the US government held itself to the same standards of behaviour as it expects other countries to do.
The government threw a spanner in the works by deciding to stifle the decision of an independent judiciary. This says an American company does not have to be bound by the same intellectual-property framework that the country is imposing on the rest of the world.Apple, emboldened by its newfound protector, is making new strides and has been allowed torevive patent claims against Google’s Motorola Mobility unit. Even more problematic, a subsequentITC ruling found that Samsung infringed upon two Apple patents – and that its products could therefore be banned in the US.
Will Obama once again intervene against such a ban, as some argue it should? This would certainly support its claims that it wants to establish and reinforce a precedent that ITC decisions are more determinations of principle than determinations of an real legal consequence.
The other option is that the administration allow an ITC ban against Samsung’s products to stand, citing the importance of the integrity of IP protection measures. This would be legally allowable but morally reprehensible.
These decisions only have limited impact on most people since they relate to older Apple and Samsung products that aren’t even generally sold anymore. But the potential for important legal precedent is nonetheless significant – and unless the Obama administration is seen to be treating all players equally, its position will reek of domestic favouritism. Content-licensing issues in Australia have long shown how well this sort of hypocrisy goes down outside the US; only time will tell how it goes down inside it.
It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow
It's no secret that Surface RT and Windows RT, in addition to Windows RT on
other platforms, didn't do at the same time as Microsoft hoped. The newest
collateral harm in that failure was Nvidia's Tegra processors, which run in the
Surface RT.
Surface/Windows RT had no shortage of skeptics even when it launched, but it's feasible points could change more than time. I am not saying that this *will* take place, but that there's a affordable scenario for it. Here's how it operates.
Initial, some Microsoft business program forensics: Microsoft desires developers to write apps for the new, Modern day UI (a.k.a. Metro). Releasing Windows 8 only for Intel architecture, they need to have believed, would have created it too easy for developers to bypass Metro since standard Windows programs would currently run on it (and on Windows 7 as well as other versions). But if Surface RT were a success, developers would desire to be on it, and would opt for to create Metro apps to be able to be on each platforms.
Nicely, that didn't work. The truth is, color me surprised in the degree of reticence of developers to create Metro apps, because the sheer quantity of customers who can run them will undoubtedly be extremely huge, even though it is modest enough to become deemed a failure for Microsoft. Don't forget, any other organization on the planet would adore to have a disaster like Windows Vista, a huge selection of millions of copies of which were sold. Such is the worst you are able to expect from Windows eight.
This vacation season you'll be able to count on to find out touch-enabled Windows systems heavily promoted and Microsoft will try other promotions to get people today shopping for apps from the retailer. In truth, the failure to obtain developers writing apps for the retailer will be the single biggest issue they have. With superior apps users will undoubtedly come, and with customers great apps will come.
And if the apps do come, then the choice to get an RT device could grow to be much a lot more affordable. There desires to become a expense benefit when compared with x86 since the RT will nonetheless be significantly less capable, or it can need to demonstrate far far better battery life or some thing to offer people today a reason to purchase it, as opposed to an Intel-based program.
Depending on the overall performance and energy consumption on the most current chips from NVidia and Intel, all of that is attainable. It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow the cost and overall performance consumption gaps, and RT will lose all its raison d'etre.
But if, come holiday time or later, the Windows app choice is respectable and RT systems are less pricey than Intel-based ones, it could possibly be completely reasonable to buy a single. If they get low-cost enough, men and women may perhaps get casual about buying them.
My money's against it, but it could happen. There have already been attempts in the past to put Windows on other architectures, however they have all failed because the Intel has normally enhanced their chip functionality enough to create the price of incompatibility also higher relative for the benefits.
You could make a case that Microsoft should really have pursued it this strategy to begin with: x86 initially, other architectures after the app marketplace was solidly established. It looks like that can be the Strategy B for Microsoft and NVidia, and maybe it was built-in from the beginning.
Surface/Windows RT had no shortage of skeptics even when it launched, but it's feasible points could change more than time. I am not saying that this *will* take place, but that there's a affordable scenario for it. Here's how it operates.
Initial, some Microsoft business program forensics: Microsoft desires developers to write apps for the new, Modern day UI (a.k.a. Metro). Releasing Windows 8 only for Intel architecture, they need to have believed, would have created it too easy for developers to bypass Metro since standard Windows programs would currently run on it (and on Windows 7 as well as other versions). But if Surface RT were a success, developers would desire to be on it, and would opt for to create Metro apps to be able to be on each platforms.
Nicely, that didn't work. The truth is, color me surprised in the degree of reticence of developers to create Metro apps, because the sheer quantity of customers who can run them will undoubtedly be extremely huge, even though it is modest enough to become deemed a failure for Microsoft. Don't forget, any other organization on the planet would adore to have a disaster like Windows Vista, a huge selection of millions of copies of which were sold. Such is the worst you are able to expect from Windows eight.
This vacation season you'll be able to count on to find out touch-enabled Windows systems heavily promoted and Microsoft will try other promotions to get people today shopping for apps from the retailer. In truth, the failure to obtain developers writing apps for the retailer will be the single biggest issue they have. With superior apps users will undoubtedly come, and with customers great apps will come.
And if the apps do come, then the choice to get an RT device could grow to be much a lot more affordable. There desires to become a expense benefit when compared with x86 since the RT will nonetheless be significantly less capable, or it can need to demonstrate far far better battery life or some thing to offer people today a reason to purchase it, as opposed to an Intel-based program.
Depending on the overall performance and energy consumption on the most current chips from NVidia and Intel, all of that is attainable. It really is also achievable that Intel will narrow the cost and overall performance consumption gaps, and RT will lose all its raison d'etre.
But if, come holiday time or later, the Windows app choice is respectable and RT systems are less pricey than Intel-based ones, it could possibly be completely reasonable to buy a single. If they get low-cost enough, men and women may perhaps get casual about buying them.
My money's against it, but it could happen. There have already been attempts in the past to put Windows on other architectures, however they have all failed because the Intel has normally enhanced their chip functionality enough to create the price of incompatibility also higher relative for the benefits.
You could make a case that Microsoft should really have pursued it this strategy to begin with: x86 initially, other architectures after the app marketplace was solidly established. It looks like that can be the Strategy B for Microsoft and NVidia, and maybe it was built-in from the beginning.
2013年7月18日星期四
Facebook’s Instagram Starts Tool for Embedding Images
Facebook Inc. (FB) is unveiling tools for its Instagram service that will
let users embed photos and videos on outside websites, including blogs and news
providers, seeking to spread its influence and woo more consumers.
The new feature requires a few clicks of a mouse to place a video or photo on a Web page, Facebook said in a blog post today. The tool, designed to maintain privacy settings, is only available for content that’s already public, the Menlo Park, California-based company said.
The owner of the world’s most popular social-networking service is rolling out new features for its Instagram unit to help expand its reach on mobile devices where users are increasingly shifting their activity. Facebook, competing against services from Twitter Inc. and others, announced last month it was adding video to its photo-sharing service.
“As always, you own your photos and videos, and we want to make sure that’s understood no matter where your content appears,” the company said. “Whether you want to embed your video on your blog or a friend wants to feature your photo on a website, everyone will clearly see that your content belongs to you.”
Instagram, which Facebook bought last year for more than $700 million, has more than 130 million monthly users. More than 16 billion photos have been shared on the service.
The new feature requires a few clicks of a mouse to place a video or photo on a Web page, Facebook said in a blog post today. The tool, designed to maintain privacy settings, is only available for content that’s already public, the Menlo Park, California-based company said.
The owner of the world’s most popular social-networking service is rolling out new features for its Instagram unit to help expand its reach on mobile devices where users are increasingly shifting their activity. Facebook, competing against services from Twitter Inc. and others, announced last month it was adding video to its photo-sharing service.
“As always, you own your photos and videos, and we want to make sure that’s understood no matter where your content appears,” the company said. “Whether you want to embed your video on your blog or a friend wants to feature your photo on a website, everyone will clearly see that your content belongs to you.”
Instagram, which Facebook bought last year for more than $700 million, has more than 130 million monthly users. More than 16 billion photos have been shared on the service.
Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together
Tablets according to Microsoft’s Windows eight and Windows RT operating
systems have struggled to obtain traction so far and Paul Thurrott of the
Supersite for Windows says there’s an incredibly basic explanation for this: The
first generation of Windows tablets just is not extremely very good. To become
clear, Thurrott says that there are many touch screen Windows eight PCs and
ultrabooks that happen to be very worthy of users’ time and that shouldn’t be
overlooked. But with regards to pure tablets, he deems that every single a
single is “simply to flawed to recommend” to everyone enthusiastic about
obtaining one particular.
“Looking around my own office, this really is what I see,” Thurrott explains. “A Surface RT that's gorgeous and light and gets terrific battery life but is worthless and frustrating in use due to its horrible overall performance. A Surface Pro that is definitely thick and heavy and gets only four.five hours of battery life when offering the weird mixture of a modest screen having a incredibly high resolution. A Samsung ATIV Clever Pc 500T (Clover Trail based) that will be laughable from a performance point of view if it weren’t for that Surface RT. (In fact, it’s still terrible.) That 700T that won’t charge anymore unless I plug the energy cord in to the tablet itself … which, wait for it, you can’t do when the keyboard is connected.”
Of course, the first round of Android-based tablets had been similarly lackluster when compared with Apple’s iPad, so it’s not as even though Windows 8 is doomed as a tablet operating system. It does suggest, on the other hand, that Microsoft and its OEM partners will should place a lot of work into adding improved functionality and value to their tablets, comparable to how Nokia has tried to make Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together with the inclusion of its industry-best 41-megapixel smartphone camera in the Lumia 1020.
Thurrott is optimistic that the following generation of Windows tablets will be a significant improvement over the existing generation considering the fact that improvements to both hardware and software program will make the devices extra palatable for buyers.
“Things are going to acquire greater,” he concludes. “Intel’s new generation Core processors, codenamed Haswell, appear to have solved the battery life problem. And Windows eight.1 appears to resolve quite a few in the issues users have highlighted in Windows 8, which include desktop show scaling. Each of these improvements recommend to me that waiting is in order, as Haswell- and Windows 8.1-based tablets will probably be plentiful in just a couple of months.”
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/microsoft-office-professional-plus-2010-full-retail-pack-p-3547.html
“Looking around my own office, this really is what I see,” Thurrott explains. “A Surface RT that's gorgeous and light and gets terrific battery life but is worthless and frustrating in use due to its horrible overall performance. A Surface Pro that is definitely thick and heavy and gets only four.five hours of battery life when offering the weird mixture of a modest screen having a incredibly high resolution. A Samsung ATIV Clever Pc 500T (Clover Trail based) that will be laughable from a performance point of view if it weren’t for that Surface RT. (In fact, it’s still terrible.) That 700T that won’t charge anymore unless I plug the energy cord in to the tablet itself … which, wait for it, you can’t do when the keyboard is connected.”
Of course, the first round of Android-based tablets had been similarly lackluster when compared with Apple’s iPad, so it’s not as even though Windows 8 is doomed as a tablet operating system. It does suggest, on the other hand, that Microsoft and its OEM partners will should place a lot of work into adding improved functionality and value to their tablets, comparable to how Nokia has tried to make Windows Telephone eight look extra cutting-edge together with the inclusion of its industry-best 41-megapixel smartphone camera in the Lumia 1020.
Thurrott is optimistic that the following generation of Windows tablets will be a significant improvement over the existing generation considering the fact that improvements to both hardware and software program will make the devices extra palatable for buyers.
“Things are going to acquire greater,” he concludes. “Intel’s new generation Core processors, codenamed Haswell, appear to have solved the battery life problem. And Windows eight.1 appears to resolve quite a few in the issues users have highlighted in Windows 8, which include desktop show scaling. Each of these improvements recommend to me that waiting is in order, as Haswell- and Windows 8.1-based tablets will probably be plentiful in just a couple of months.”
http://www.windows7retailbox.com/microsoft-office-professional-plus-2010-full-retail-pack-p-3547.html
2013年7月7日星期日
Google says Moto X phone release date is July 11th
Motorola is floating invites for the introduction of its Moto X phone,
finally putting a face to the mythical product. For as long as the Android
platform has been around, the X phone was rumored as Google’s direct in-house
answer to the iPhone. Five years later Google’s subsidiary Motorola is debuting
the X phone. Beyond that fact that it is indeed real, we still know nothing
about it. And that’s even after Motorola has told is plenty about it.
Last month a Motorola rep teased the X Phone as having future features like the ability to take a pill which turns your entire body into a password, or a tattoo which does the same. If such comic book style features ever do come to the Moto X, it won’t happen next week. The X phone debuting on July 11th will be much tamer, but is still for a moment a blank slate. Rumors have pegged the X as coming in a choice of colors and custom engravings, a sideshow which still doesn’t tell us anything about the phone itself.
The question the Moto X phone must answer is twofold: what makes it more appealing than the existing Android phones on the market? And what makes it an “answer” to the iPhone such that iPhone users might be tempted to switch? Not a word of what’s leaked so far gives us even a hint at either answer. But the Moto X, the international phone of mystery, debuts on July 11th nonetheless.
Last month a Motorola rep teased the X Phone as having future features like the ability to take a pill which turns your entire body into a password, or a tattoo which does the same. If such comic book style features ever do come to the Moto X, it won’t happen next week. The X phone debuting on July 11th will be much tamer, but is still for a moment a blank slate. Rumors have pegged the X as coming in a choice of colors and custom engravings, a sideshow which still doesn’t tell us anything about the phone itself.
The question the Moto X phone must answer is twofold: what makes it more appealing than the existing Android phones on the market? And what makes it an “answer” to the iPhone such that iPhone users might be tempted to switch? Not a word of what’s leaked so far gives us even a hint at either answer. But the Moto X, the international phone of mystery, debuts on July 11th nonetheless.
订阅：
博文 (Atom)